Передумови та проблеми економічного розвитку України в умовах світової економічної кризи
Вантажиться...
Файли
Дата
2020
Автори
Мейш, А.В.
Гавриш, Р.О.
Meish, A.V.
Havrysh, R.O.
Назва журналу
Номер ISSN
Назва тому
Видавець
Хмельницький національний університет
Анотація
Економічні результати попередньої владної команди (2014–2019 рр.) мали неоднорідні та неоднозначні результати.
Завершення ж виборчих марафонів упродовж І половини 2019 р. і формування нової «однопартійної» владної команди
створили потенційно сприятливі передумови для запровадження швидких економічних трансформацій, реалізації
результативної моделі прискорення економічного зростання і розвитку України. Однак, потенціал можливостей було швидко
вичерпано – позитиви не встигли проявитися, натомість, наприкінці року з’явилися серйозні приводи для розчарувань.
The internal environment creates certain positive preconditions linked to the new government’s willingness to undertake radical transformations, to impart greater dynamism to internal development and institutional transformations, to accelerate innovations based on the latest digital technologies and to significantly intensify investment processes. The economic results of the previous governments (2014–2019) were diverse and mixed. The finale of election marathons in the first half of 2019 followed by the formation of the new “single-party” ruling team created potentially favourable conditions for introduction of rapid economic transformations and implementation of a productive model for accelerated economic growth and development. However, the potential of opportunities has been exhausted speedily, as positives had no time to manifest. Instead, at the end of the year, serious reasons for disappointment have emerged. 2019 was marked by two major trends in the economy – the continued course towards creation of institutional grounds for encouraging economic development in line with the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement and other Ukraine’s international commitments, and efforts to substantially adjust the model of the country’s economic development on the basis of so-called libertarianism, which largely defines the political priorities declared by the new Ukrainian government following the 2019 presidential and parliamentary elections. There is a movement in the wake of approaches and priorities of the previous foreign policy course. The government has declared its intentions to deepen European and Euro-Atlantic integration, to develop partnership with the United States, to resolve problems with neighbours, and to end the war in Donbas. However, the reality, at least in the Russian and American “segments”, gives no particular grounds for optimism.
The internal environment creates certain positive preconditions linked to the new government’s willingness to undertake radical transformations, to impart greater dynamism to internal development and institutional transformations, to accelerate innovations based on the latest digital technologies and to significantly intensify investment processes. The economic results of the previous governments (2014–2019) were diverse and mixed. The finale of election marathons in the first half of 2019 followed by the formation of the new “single-party” ruling team created potentially favourable conditions for introduction of rapid economic transformations and implementation of a productive model for accelerated economic growth and development. However, the potential of opportunities has been exhausted speedily, as positives had no time to manifest. Instead, at the end of the year, serious reasons for disappointment have emerged. 2019 was marked by two major trends in the economy – the continued course towards creation of institutional grounds for encouraging economic development in line with the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement and other Ukraine’s international commitments, and efforts to substantially adjust the model of the country’s economic development on the basis of so-called libertarianism, which largely defines the political priorities declared by the new Ukrainian government following the 2019 presidential and parliamentary elections. There is a movement in the wake of approaches and priorities of the previous foreign policy course. The government has declared its intentions to deepen European and Euro-Atlantic integration, to develop partnership with the United States, to resolve problems with neighbours, and to end the war in Donbas. However, the reality, at least in the Russian and American “segments”, gives no particular grounds for optimism.
Опис
Ключові слова
економіка, криза, національна економіка, пандемія, economy, crisis, national economy, pandemic
Бібліографічний опис
Мейш, А.В. Передумови та проблеми економічного розвитку України [Текст] / А. В. Мейш, Р. О. Гавриш // Вісник Хмельницького національного університету. Економічні науки. – 2020. – №5. – С.111-115.