Соціальні проблеми подолання кризових явищ та шляхи їх вирішення
Вантажиться...
Дата
2015
Автори
Приступа, М.І.
Prystupa, M.I.
Назва журналу
Номер ISSN
Назва тому
Видавець
Хмельницький національний університет
Анотація
У статті розглянуто тенденції та наслідки розгортання кризових процесів в Україні у 2008–2009 р.р. і 2013–2015
р.р. Здійснено порівняння основних економічних та соціальних проявів двох криз. Розглянуто зниження базових показників
добробуту українських громадян внаслідок слабкої економічної динвміки. Визначено можливі етапи виходу з кризи та
продовження процесу європейської інтеграції.
The aim of the article is to analyse the social problems of the crisis overcoming and determine their solutions.Over the past five years, Ukraine is again trying to overcome the crisis shock. Each of the shocks had its own peculiarities and each was formed by their basic factors and components. However, common features of crisis processes escalation in Ukraine in 2008-2009 and 2013–2015 indicate that the results and consequences of the two crises may also be close. In this case, today Ukraine to prevent another crisis shock may use additional anti-crisis measures and measures for economic recovery that were not properly taken into account and involved in the post-crisis period of 2010–2012. If the crisis of 2008-2009 in Ukraine, as elsewhere in the world, was really unexpected, to the crisis of 2013–2015 the country was consistently approaching. Despite the positive dynamics of real GDP in 2010-2011 it can not be classified as sustainable growth, because in fact there was only partial compensation for losses (fall) in 2009. Crisis of 2008-2009 and 2013–2015 exacerbated social contradictions concerning formation of fair relations in Ukraine. The weak economic dynamics can not substantially improve the real welfare of Ukrainian citizens. To exit the crisis and continue the process of european integration Ukraine needs a radical restructuring of the economy and the corresponding creation of new jobs, which should take place gradually from one to another stage of deployment of investment and innovation, the growth of domestic savings and the inflow of foreign capital.
The aim of the article is to analyse the social problems of the crisis overcoming and determine their solutions.Over the past five years, Ukraine is again trying to overcome the crisis shock. Each of the shocks had its own peculiarities and each was formed by their basic factors and components. However, common features of crisis processes escalation in Ukraine in 2008-2009 and 2013–2015 indicate that the results and consequences of the two crises may also be close. In this case, today Ukraine to prevent another crisis shock may use additional anti-crisis measures and measures for economic recovery that were not properly taken into account and involved in the post-crisis period of 2010–2012. If the crisis of 2008-2009 in Ukraine, as elsewhere in the world, was really unexpected, to the crisis of 2013–2015 the country was consistently approaching. Despite the positive dynamics of real GDP in 2010-2011 it can not be classified as sustainable growth, because in fact there was only partial compensation for losses (fall) in 2009. Crisis of 2008-2009 and 2013–2015 exacerbated social contradictions concerning formation of fair relations in Ukraine. The weak economic dynamics can not substantially improve the real welfare of Ukrainian citizens. To exit the crisis and continue the process of european integration Ukraine needs a radical restructuring of the economy and the corresponding creation of new jobs, which should take place gradually from one to another stage of deployment of investment and innovation, the growth of domestic savings and the inflow of foreign capital.
Опис
Ключові слова
криза, соціально-економічні показники, соціально справедливі відносини, crisis, social and economic indicators, socially fair relations
Бібліографічний опис
Приступа, М.І. Соціальні проблеми подолання кризових явищ та шляхи їх вирішення [Текст] / М. І. Приступа // Вісник Хмельницького національного університету. Економічні науки. – 2015. – № 4, т. 2. – С. 183-186.